Mormonism explained?

I'm looking forward to the four-hour PBS documentary on Mormonism tonight and tomorrow night. Watch it and then come back and discuss: fair/unfair, favorable/unfavorable, accurate/inaccurate. If there are any Baptist ministers in Texas who may have been in attendance at a pre-Sadie Hawkins dinner at McDonalds on 43rd and Thunderbird about fifteen years ago who are reading this, I'm particularly interested in your opinions.

The Church leaders officially seem to be optimistic, even though they haven't screened this yet.

{I wonder if Christopher Hitchens will make an appearance.}

Comments

Anonymous said…
Perhaps I am exposing my lameness by asking the question, but who is Chrisopher Hitchens?
April 30, 2007 4:52 PM
AmyJune said…
I too am very interested to see what they will say about us on PBS tonight.
April 30, 2007 5:22 PM
Anonymous said…
15 years ago. Wow, I feel old.

I actually missed the first night. I had been looking forward to it and ended up in a meeting at the church and forgot to record it. What were your thoughts?
April 30, 2007 8:46 PM
Emily said…
It's tonight and tomorrow night. Probably on right this minute in Texas.
April 30, 2007 8:51 PM
Kelly(M&M) said…
Hey Emily,

I am looking forward to this also. I am always interested to see how the church is portrayed. I Tivo'd it tonight, so I will let you know my thoughts after I see it.
May 01, 2007 12:54 AM
{Erica} said…
Little disappointed...maybe tonight will be better. I don't like that they kept referring to that polygamy family as Mormon...it confuses people.
May 01, 2007 7:48 AM
Anonymous said…
I watched for awhile last night, then got a little annoyed with the dark paintings of Joseph Smith and others. Actually I kept changing the channel, only to find nothing else on, so I was pulled back every 10 minutes or so. Finally just went to bed.
May 01, 2007 9:31 AM
abby said…
Some of those historians had it a little off, which is buggin because they come off so authoritative on the subject.
May 01, 2007 10:28 AM
Christen Noelle said…
I was not too happy with it, I can say that the only time I had a good feeling about it was when clips of President Hinckley were shown or the very few times a general authority spoke.

I agree with Sarah the art was quite dark, I am so used to the artwork of our amazing LDS artists or other spiritual artists out there.

My stepfather said a lot of the content was from anti-lds literature, he would know he read it all during years of inactivity.

I have high hopes tonight will be better, but I know they will touch on same gender attraction, and will definitely be interesting.
May 01, 2007 10:53 AM
Anonymous said…
Abby, would you mind pointing out some of the places where the historians were incorrect? I was unable to watch the first night but hope to catch it tonight and I'm interested in your perspective.
May 01, 2007 2:42 PM
Anonymous said…
the pro-romney agenda at pbs will sadly be for naught..
May 01, 2007 3:37 PM
Carina said…
The pro-Romney agenda at PBS: that's hilarious! I haven't read such a ridiculous comment in months, thanks for the laugh.

I can't stand Christopher Hitchens and now I like him even less. He's a tool.

It was an interesting night one. For those who aren't familiar with PBS, they usually re-run programming in the early morning hours. Check your listings and you should be able to catch the re-run of episode one if you missed it.
May 01, 2007 3:48 PM
Anonymous said…
n, go pedal your anti-Mormonism someplace else. Either that, or get a real identity instead of hiding behind an anonymous entry.

I despise political operatives that disguise themselves. I also despise people who merely spread mis-information and hatred instead of adding positively to the debate and discourse. Ask yourself why you find it necessary to promote hate speech.
May 01, 2007 3:52 PM
Emily said…
Whoa. So far there has only been one person here spreading hatred and adding negatively to the debate and it's not my brother N. Get over yourself. It's kind of an embarrassment to the anti-antiMormon cause.
May 01, 2007 4:04 PM
Emily said…
Also, the "hiding behind an anonymous entry" bit is too, too rich.

Neil, do you think Romney's campaign is a goner, now that he's identified himself with Hubbard? Please elaborate.

Also, Steve said his views on last night's show were complex, and I feel the same way. Maybe I'll be better able to articulate them tomorrow.
May 01, 2007 4:38 PM
Anonymous said…
so "n buster" is either the romney staffer who just got sacked for recommending battlefield earth (!) for the fav novel question to the guy who's major political roadblock is his association with non-mainstream religion or, um, a scientologist. which is it, buster?
May 01, 2007 5:15 PM
Emily said…
Ah! I love you, n.
May 01, 2007 5:17 PM
Neil and Diana said…
n buster, I think "I despise people who ..." qualifies as hate speech.
May 01, 2007 6:11 PM
everydayjami said…
I watched the first 20 minutes, then I got bored. Maybe tonight will hold more interest for me. I agree w/ Christen very dark.
May 01, 2007 8:38 PM
Emily said…
Steve thinks n buster is putting us on, that it's got to be someone who knows Neil who thinks he would appreciate the irony of the hate speech/anonymity facets of his comment. Neil, do you know any scientologists?
May 02, 2007 12:34 AM
Neil and Diana said…
Em, what did you think of last night's program?
May 02, 2007 7:25 AM
Nancy said…
I liked parts a lot. Like the humanitarian part about Katrina, and I really liked the story they followed about the amazing 11 kid, smart talented family with the girl with the terminal illness. I liked them, and overall I found it interesting, but struggled with some of the "history" that I felt was miskewed, I also really enjoyed the convert story of the lady who thought the church was LSD. She was great.
May 02, 2007 9:14 AM
Anonymous said…
Nancy, Abby made a similar comment about some of the history being skewed. I was hoping you could give me some specific instances? As an "outsider" in this conversation (I am not Mormon), I genuinely want to understand from every angle.
May 02, 2007 9:30 AM
Anonymous said…
emily, you have sparked some serious conversation here.

n buster is annoying and I agree, richly anonymous, hmmm.....
May 02, 2007 9:37 AM
Anonymous said…
The PBS piece was interesting, but it struck me as being more about the sociology and psychology of Mormonism than LDS theology. Since those commenting were seemingly either committed or former LDS, it played like a see-saw of competing loyalties, like a stylized family feud with little new to offer. Who doesn’t know that Mormon’s value family and are very, very, very, very nice people? Any critic can deconstruct a religious movement, but you can’t spare the dirty work of evaluating theological arguments, whatever the outcome. Maybe that wasn’t the place. Maybe they did that in the other episode. Maybe I’m just bummed that the Mavericks are down 3-2 against the Warriors. Whatever the case, I thought the special was a well produced let-down.
May 02, 2007 10:29 AM
Anonymous said…
Adam, nicely put.
May 02, 2007 10:46 AM
Emily said…
Adam, I agree! Theology was not covered much at all. There was so so so much that went undiscussed. It was far from exhaustive, but I guess that wasn't the producer's intention.

Thanks for commenting, and what in the world is up with those Mavericks?!
May 02, 2007 11:41 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anyone else?

I just read this scripture quoted in a blog comment thread, alluding to. . .me. 2 Nephi 9:28 28 O that cunning plan of the evil one! O the vainness, and the frailties, and the foolishness of men! When they are learned they think they are wise, and they hearken not unto the counsel of God, for they set it aside, supposing they know of themselves, wherefore, their wisdom is foolishness and it profiteth them not. The context: I had suggested that Ezra Taft Benson's political views as expressed in 1968 before he was the prophet were not the official political views of the church, and shouldn't be construed as such. It is actually not the first time this month that I've been told through scriptural references that I am a wicked person {my extrapolated take-away from the conversations}. I give up.
Read more

Another taboo topic: money

I don't have a lot of real visible or artistic talents, but one talent that has served me well is an ability to manage and organize money well. A few of my sisters-in-law have asked me how I do the family budget, so this is a straight up accounting of how I do the accounting. When we get a paycheck: 10% tithing right off the top Then, with the remainder (net minus tithing), I divy it up into percentages and put money into different "funds" -- that I keep track of in the back of my paycheck because I'm old school like that. Mortgage: I figure out the percentage it will take to cover my mortgage. Usually 29-30%. I think this percentage needs to stay under 35% of take-home after tithing. Baby steps: 20% goes to meeting financial goals a la Dave Ramsey's baby steps. This means that you focus on one thing at a time, leaving the rest so that your money is not so thinly spread and you can make visible progress. This presupposes that one has abandoned using credit, and i
Read more